Turn on Threat Extraction before Sandboxing for email. Let the engine rebuild the file instantly (safe mode), then sandbox the original in the background. Your users will never see a delay, and you still get the IoCs. Disclaimer: This evaluation is based on public testing data (MITRE ATT&CK v12, SE Labs 2024 reports) and enterprise deployment feedback from the DFIR community. Always conduct a proof-of-concept in your own environment.
Enter Check Point. With its SandBlast and Infinity Core platforms, Check Point promises more than just a sandbox. But does it deliver? Here is the hard evaluation. Turn on Threat Extraction before Sandboxing for email
Check Point’s sandboxing is technically superior to most competitors (Fortinet, Palo Alto WildFire) when it comes to evasive malware detection . However, its operational value depends entirely on your team’s ability to tune the alerting and manage the throughput licensing. Disclaimer: This evaluation is based on public testing
But in 2025, threat actors have learned to play the game. They use long sleep timers, check for virtual machine artifacts, and require specific registry keys that don’t exist in a standard sandbox. Consequently, a "detonation" is no longer enough. Security Operations Centers (SOCs) need context, speed, and integration. With its SandBlast and Infinity Core platforms, Check
If you are looking for a "set it and forget it" sandbox—look elsewhere. If you want a forensic engine that tells you exactly why a file is malicious and blocks it at the CPU level—Check Point is the market leader.
Beyond the Detonation Chamber: Evaluating Check Point’s Sandboxing for Modern Security Operations